World

WWIII is Necessary

What’s Wrong with Us?

Let’s look at what this world has become. We apparently have an oil shortage which causes the price of oil and fuel to rise; we have mass slaughters of animals such as sharks and seals amongst others that are nearing extinction due to our desire for wealth; we have devastatingly polluted waters; there are signs of global warming everywhere we look; the prices of land and other natural resource are on the rise due to scarcity. And this list of fundamental problems is just to name a few. And the cause of all these world-wide issues can be summed up in one word: overpopulation.

There’s Just Too Many… People

Overpopulation is destroying our planet. Now what can be a solution to this global dilemma? Simple —World War III. The news is overheated with articles about state tensions. It’s filled with Governor Palin saying this about Russia, or North Korea doing that to protest the US and the final solution for all of this is just one country to fire a single missile. Involve China, India, Russia, US, North Korea, Iran, and a few other nations from around the globe into the mix and you’ll have yourself a nice war that will hopefully kill off around one billion people. This colossal war will not only save the sea creatures but will get rid of any problems we face with scarcity and pollution.

The Aftermath

Survival of the smartest. There will definitely be a nation power change and if in some way we can avoid using nuclear weapons during the war, then the majority that will survive will be the smartest and richest people on earth. I know that the poor hate the rich, but once the war will subdue and the majority of the poor people die off, we can replenish this planet with useful individuals who can help the earth prosper for future generations rather than destroy it. This sounds like a very cruel method of saving the earth from ourselves, but drastic times call for drastic measures, and if you ask me, the period we are living in now is the most drastic it has ever been for history of not only man, but also the millions of other species on earth.

WWII vs WWIII

In no way am I suggesting another WWII. Obliterating selective ethnicities or committing genocides would be disastrous. All I’m implying is that in order to save the earth, and I look at this from a totally ethical view, WWIII is a necessity. I cannot stress enough how horrifying this war would be, but if we want our earth to get back on course where the biggest dilemmas aren’t mass starvations, oil shortages, and the fear of melting glaciers that would cause floods throughout the world, then a world war isn’t such a crazy idea after all.

Concluding Thoughts

What we must all ask ourselves isn’t whether this is a ridiculous idea, but whether or not it’s worth killing a billion or so now to save billions in the future? It’s difficult to cope with the thought that murder can be the answer, but now that we have reached such a time in our lives where it is, is it worth carrying out? Or are we just too greedy to let a few die now (which might include you or me) to allow future generations to enjoy what we have been so lucky to experience?

This post was submitted by Cornelius F..

 Subscribe to Wikiweblog

© 2008 WikiWeblog.